Reportedly with a blend of melon, honey, and citrus scents, this perfume (which doesn't have an official release date yet) is marketed "Per i bimbi!!" For kids.
It's a unisex perfume, and you dab it on (not a spray). But is it too much?
Now, before you go all crazy on Dolce & Gabbana, they aren't the only brand to market luxury perfumes to babies. Burberry, Bvlgari, and L'Occitane also are on top of this trend. And I can't believe it's a trend. For one thing, isn't it crazy expensive for a baby who, lets face it, is just going to poop in his diaper anyway? And all these added fragrances, isn't that bad for a baby's skin or respiratory system?
It's cute, don't get me wrong. And I won't lie, I'd definitely test it on myself if I saw it on display. But I just can't see myself justifying this one. This, for me, goes the same place as haute couture for toddlers. It's never too early to teach kids consumerism, now, is it.
Pictures of the advert are in the gallery.
What do you think of designer, luxury baby perfume?
image source
image source image source image source image source image source image source
True
Comments (10)
I like the smell of baby powder I think that is enough
What a waste- clean babies have a wonderful natural scent.
It's gotta be loaded with preservatives and chemicals. I would ask myself if this is really necessary.
I prefer the smell of baby. Their natural scent (when it isn't a dirty diaper) is nice.
That being said, I'd never buy my baby perfume.
Babies smell just perfect and dont need anything additional
That is so stupid, perfumes contain chemicals toxic for adults why expose a child to that as they are developing their immune system?
Johnson's baby cologne has existed forever, virtually without competition, and nobody's ever made a fuss. It only surprises me that this didn't happen sooner.
oh my god. what will they think of next.
I wouldn't buy it, but there are worse things on the market now than baby perfume, so this product doesn't really bother me.